LIFE Trial ：Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death. We aimed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and， consequently， reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death.
相关链接：与阿替洛尔相比，阻断血管紧张素II受体降低新发心房纤颤和继发卒中
Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):995-1003. Dahlof B， Devereux RB， Kjeldsen SE， Julius S， Beevers G， de Faire U， Fyhrquist F， Ibsen H， Kristiansson K， Lederballe-Pedersen O， Lindholm LH， Nieminen MS， Omvik P， Oparil S， Wedel H; LIFE Study Group. Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra， Gothenburg， Swede. bdahlof@scandinaviancri.se
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death. We aimed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and， consequently， reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death.
METHODS: We did a double-masked， randomised， parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55-80 years with essential hypertension (sitting blood pressure 160-200/95-115 mm Hg) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography (ECG). We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event (death， myocardial infarction， or stroke). We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens.
FINDINGS: Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 (SD 18.5/10.1) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg (19.2/10.1) in the losartan and atenolol groups， respectively. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan (23.8 per 1000 patient-years) and 588 atenolol patients (27.9 per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 0.87， 95% CI 0.77-0.98， p=0.021). 204 losartan and 234 atenolol patients died from cardiovascular disease (0.89， 0.73-1.07， p=0.206); 232 and 309， respectively， had fatal or non-fatal stroke (0.75， 0.63-0.89， p=0.001); and myocardial infarction (non-fatal and fatal) occurred in 198 and 188， respectively (1.07， 0.88-1.31， p=0.491). New-onset diabetes was less frequent with losartan.Interpretation Losartan prevents more cardiovascular morbidity and death than atenolol for a similar reduction in blood pressure and is better tolerated. Losartan seems to confer benefits beyond reduction in blood pressure.
京公网安备 11010502033353号